improving-shelf-life-of-bispecific-antibody-drugs

Improving Shelf Life of Bispecific Antibody Drugs: A Formulation Imperative

Improving Shelf Life of Bispecific Antibody Drugs: A Formulation Imperative

Improving Shelf Life of Bispecific Antibody Drugs: A Formulation Imperative

06.07.2025

7

Minutes

Leukocare Editorial Team

06.07.2025

7

Minutes

Leukocare Editorial Team

Are you grappling with the complex challenges of developing new biologic drugs, including improving their shelf life? Discover how a data-driven approach to formulation can accelerate your progress and ensure program success.

Menu

Formulating Success: Navigating the Pressures of Modern Drug Product Development

FAQ

1. Current Situation

2. Typical Market Trends

3. Current Challenges and How They Are Solved

4. How Leukocare Can Support These Challenges

5. Value Provided to Customers

Formulating Success: Navigating the Pressures of Modern Drug Product Development

For leaders in CMC and Drug Product Development, the path from molecule to market is a constant balancing act. The pressure is on to move faster, work with leaner teams, and tackle increasingly complex biologic and genetic medicines. Getting the formulation right is not just a scientific challenge; it's a strategic necessity that can determine the success or failure of a program. This article looks at the current landscape, the challenges teams like yours are facing, and how a focused, data-driven approach to formulation can clear the path forward.

1. Current Situation

The drug development world is more diverse than ever. We see well-funded virtual biotechs aiming for a rapid path to a Biologics License Application (BLA) by outsourcing everything. [1, 9] Startups with solid seed funding and experienced CMC leadership need to move quickly to IND/Phase I, managing a network of external partners to get there. [2]

At the same time, mid-size biotechs with established internal drug product teams are hitting bandwidth limits. They often need to bring in specialized expertise for difficult projects or new types of molecules. Large pharma companies are also in the mix, building on their internal resources to tackle new modalities like viral vectors and RNA, where they may have gaps in experience. [3] Across the board, there's a reliance on a network of external partners, from discovery to fill-and-finish.

2. Typical Market Trends

Several key trends define the current market. The push for accelerated development is universal. Programs with Fast-Track or Breakthrough Therapy designations face intense pressure, compressing traditional CMC timelines from years down to months. [4, 5] This requires a different way of working, with process and formulation development happening in parallel.

Outsourcing is no longer just a cost-saving measure but a core strategy. [6] The global pharmaceutical CDMO market is expected to grow significantly, reaching an estimated $315.08 billion by 2034, up from $146.05 billion in 2023. [7] This trend is driven by the need for specialized capabilities, especially for biologics and advanced therapies. [8] The rise of virtual and semi-virtual companies, which rely almost entirely on contract partners, further fuels this growth. [1, 9]

The industry is moving into more complex therapeutic areas. The development of biologics, viral vectors, and RNA-based medicines presents unique formulation challenges, from managing aggregation and viscosity to ensuring stability during storage and transport. [10, 12, 13, 15]

3. Current Challenges and How They Are Solved

Across different company types, the challenges often sound familiar:

  • Time and Resource Pressure: Board-level expectations and accelerated timelines leave no room for error. Teams are stretched thin, with limited internal bandwidth to handle every aspect of a project. This pressure is especially acute in programs on an expedited timeline, where CMC activities must keep pace with a rapid clinical program. [5]

  • Vendor Management: Finding the right partners is hard. Many teams have had poor experiences with service providers who act more like academics than solution-oriented partners or who offer generic, templated solutions. Onboarding new vendors can also be slow and difficult, especially when internal procurement processes are rigid.

  • Scientific and Regulatory Hurdles: Formulating large molecules and new modalities is scientifically demanding. Issues like aggregation, degradation, and stability can derail a project. [10, 13] A poorly formulated biologic can trigger an unwanted immune response in patients. [14] For new modalities like RNA, ensuring stability and effective delivery are major obstacles. All of this must be documented in a robust CMC package that satisfies regulatory agencies. [16]

To solve these problems, teams are looking for partners who can do more than just execute a work plan. They need collaborators who bring a strategic perspective, proactively solve problems, and communicate clearly. The solution often involves finding a specialized partner for a specific, difficult challenge, like formulation, to complement an existing network of CROs and CDMOs. The key is to find a partner who can integrate smoothly without adding friction.

4. How Leukocare Can Support These Challenges

A dedicated formulation partner can address these pressures directly. The goal is to act as a co-strategist, not just an executor.

For companies on a fast track, this means providing a clear, efficient path to a robust, commercial-ready formulation. By using tools like a smart formulation platform and AI-based stability prediction, development can be accelerated. [17] This approach uses predictive modeling to design better experiments, providing a data-driven formulation tailored to aggressive timelines.

For smaller biotechs, the right partner brings structure and proactive guidance. [18] This means offering clear communication, structured processes, and documentation ready for investors and regulatory bodies. The focus is on real understanding and tangible results, not just buzzwords.

For larger organizations, support is about providing specialized expertise for tough challenges. This could mean tackling a new modality or addressing a specific stability issue. A formulation partner can support internal drug product teams without competing with them, proving its value through a pilot project and then scaling as needed. By offering deep technical knowledge in areas like vectors and ADCs, a partner can provide specific insights, case studies, and tailored materials that help internal teams make better decisions.

For CDMOs, a neutral formulation partner can help them offer a full-service package without building an internal team. [19] This allows them to retain clients and ensure smooth project execution. The partner handles the formulation development independently, acting as a seamless extension of the CDMO's team with loyalty to the partnership.

5. Value Provided to Customers

The value of a dedicated formulation partner is clarity and confidence.

  • For the Fast-Track Leader: The gain is a faster path to BLA. The value comes from a formulation designed by science, guided by data, and built for regulatory success.

  • For the Small Biotech: The gain is data-informed decision-making and hands-on support. This provides structure, speed, and substance, all driven by data and delivered with reliability.

  • For the Mid-size Biotech: The gain is reliable, data-driven expertise for overflow or niche challenges. It’s about solving a complex problem with a modeling platform and formulation intelligence that delivers trustworthy results.

  • For the Pharma Tackling New Modalities: The gain is data-backed insights and predictive modeling. This helps de-risk new modality development and supports internal decision-making with real data and tailored formulation design.

  • For the CDMO Partner: The gain is a discreet, low-maintenance partner. The value lies in delivering data-driven formulation decisions with minimal friction, acting as a silent, seamless, and science-backed formulation team that is always loyal to the client relationship.

In a field defined by high stakes and complexity, having the right partners is essential. A focused, data-driven, and collaborative approach to formulation can make the difference, turning scientific potential into a successful therapeutic product.

FAQ

Q1: We already have a primary CRO/CDMO. Why would we need a separate formulation partner?

Many teams bring in a specialized formulation partner to handle specific, high-stakes challenges that fall outside their primary CDMO's core strengths. This is common for projects involving new or complex modalities (like viral vectors, RNA) or for addressing persistent stability or viscosity issues. A dedicated partner can provide focused expertise and advanced technologies, like predictive modeling, to solve a niche problem, complementing your existing relationships without replacing them.

Q2: How can a formulation partner help accelerate our timeline to IND/BLA?

An experienced partner can accelerate timelines by using data-driven and predictive approaches. Instead of relying solely on traditional, trial-and-error screening, AI-based modeling can predict stable formulations more quickly and with less material. [20] This allows for the parallel optimization of formulation alongside cell line and process development, compressing the CMC timeline, which is a major benefit for programs with Fast-Track designation.

Q3: Our company is virtual, with no internal lab. How would a partnership work? [5]

Formulation partners are well-suited to work with virtual companies. [21] They are designed to act as your strategic drug product team. The process typically involves proactive communication, where the partner takes the lead on designing the development strategy, executing the work, and providing clear, concise reports and documentation suitable for regulatory filings and investor updates. This reduces the management burden on your team.

Q4: We are concerned about onboarding a new vendor. How do you ensure a smooth process?

A smooth start is key. A good partner will often begin with a small, well-defined pilot project. This allows your team to see the process and results firsthand without committing to a long-term, large-scale engagement. This "prove it first" approach helps build trust and confidence, showing that the new partner will not add friction or risk to the project.

Q5: How do you support formulation for new modalities like RNA and viral vectors?

Supporting new modalities requires deep technical expertise in those specific areas. [22] This involves understanding the unique degradation pathways and stability challenges of, for example, AAV vectors or lipid nanoparticles for mRNA. Support can include tailored mini-workshops for your team, providing specific case studies, and using formulation platforms designed to address the challenges of these advanced therapies, ensuring the final formulation is stable, effective, and ready for clinical use. [12, 15]

Literature

  1. pharmatimes.com

  2. pacificbiolabs.com

  3. nih.gov

  4. quotientsciences.com

  5. agilebiologics.com

  6. europeanpharmaceuticalreview.com

  7. towardshealthcare.com

  8. contractpharma.com

  9. solemglobal.com

  10. idbs.com

  11. nih.gov

  12. susupport.com

  13. ascendiacdmo.com

  14. pharmtech.com

  15. nih.gov

  16. news-medical.net

  17. ymerdigital.com

  18. ijpsjournal.com

  19. researchgate.net

  20. nih.gov

  21. drug-dev.com

  22. researchgate.net

Further Articles

Further Articles

Further Articles