ai-tools-for-predicting-viscosity-of-mabs

Taming the Syrup: AI Tools for Predicting Viscosity of mAbs

Taming the Syrup: AI Tools for Predicting Viscosity of mAbs

Taming the Syrup: AI Tools for Predicting Viscosity of mAbs

12.08.2025

6

Minutes

Leukocare Editorial Team

12.08.2025

6

Minutes

Leukocare Editorial Team

Are high-concentration mAb formulations causing viscosity nightmares in your drug development? This article explores how AI tools for predicting viscosity of mAbs are transforming the process, helping teams avoid costly delays and create patient-friendly medicines. Dive in to learn more.

Menu

Taming the Syrup: Using AI to Predict Viscosity in mAb Formulations

FAQ

1. Current Situation

2. Typical Market Trends

4. How Leukocare Can Support These Challenges

5. Value Provided to Customers

Taming the Syrup: Using AI to Predict Viscosity in mAb Formulations

High-concentration monoclonal antibody (mAb) formulations are key for modern medicines, but they bring a big challenge: viscosity. If you're a Director in CMC or Drug Product Development, you know the struggle. A promising molecule can turn into a thick, un-injectable fluid at high concentrations, pushing your team back to square one and slowing things down. This article looks at how AI-powered prediction tools are changing this whole situation, helping teams spot and avoid viscosity issues right from the start.

1. Current Situation

Often, the goal is a high-concentration biologic you can give as a shot under the skin. This is easier for patients and less of a strain on healthcare compared to IV drips.[1, 2] Getting a mAb to a concentration of 100 mg/mL, 150 mg/mL, or even higher often causes the solution to become excessively thick.[28, 29, 3]

High viscosity can cause a lot of problems. It makes manufacturing steps like sterile filtration and fill-finish harder, possibly taking longer and causing more clumps.[4, 8] For patients, it can make getting a shot difficult or painful, or even impossible with a regular syringe.[3, 6, 28, 29] For a long time, dealing with viscosity meant reacting to problems as they came up, using a lot of trial and error. Teams would find the issue late in development, then start the painstaking work of checking different excipients and buffer conditions to find a good formulation, wasting valuable time and materials.[7]

2. Typical Market Trends

The biopharmaceutical market is clearly shifting towards patient-friendly ways to give medicine. Giving medicine as a shot under the skin isn't just a bonus anymore; it's a key goal for many new biologics and for managing existing ones throughout their life.[1, 2] This push means we need more high-concentration formulations, which makes viscosity an even bigger and more common problem.[4, 8]

At the same time, there's a growing use of computer tools and in silico analysis early in drug development.[10, 11, 9] The industry is moving from a "fail late" to a "fail early and fast" model. Using predictive analytics to figure out "developability" (how likely a candidate is to become a stable, manufacturable, and effective drug) is becoming standard practice. Identifying potential viscosity issues before a candidate enters cell line development can save millions of dollars and months of work.[12, 13]

3. Current Challenges and How They Are Solved

The main challenge is that viscosity in concentrated mAb solutions comes from complicated interactions between molecules.[15, 16] These protein-protein interactions depend on the antibody's unique sequence and structure, particularly the charge and hydrophobicity of its variable regions, and also the formulation's pH and excipients.

Traditional solutions involve extensive experimental screening:[15, 16]

  • Excipient Screening: Testing various additives like salts, amino acids (such as arginine), and sugars to disrupt protein-protein interactions.

  • pH and Buffer Optimization: Adjusting the formulation pH to modulate the net charge on the antibody, which can reduce viscosity.[17, 18, 19]

  • Protein Engineering: In some cases, re-engineering the antibody sequence itself to remove surface patches that promote self-association.[28, 29, 3]

While these methods work, they use a lot of materials and take a lot of time.[20] Early-stage materials are super valuable, and using them for extensive formulation screening across many candidates just isn't always practical.

This is where AI and machine learning models really help. These computer tools look at an antibody's amino acid sequence and its predicted shape to guess how viscous it will be. By teaching algorithms using lots of data from antibodies with known viscosity, these models can spot patterns and molecular details that link to high viscosity.[21, 26] These models can accurately predict if a mAb will be too viscous at a certain concentration.[23, 24] This means teams can check and rank candidates on a computer, long before they even make the first bit of protein.[25, 27]

4. How Leukocare Can Support These Challenges

At Leukocare, we build AI-driven prediction right into how we develop formulations. Our method is designed to solve the common frustrations of both fast-paced biotech and established pharma companies. We get that you need to move fast without making mistakes.

Our platform blends predictive modeling with a deep understanding of formulations. We don't just use AI for predictions; we use it to intelligently design formulations. By looking at a mAb's structural details, our models can predict its viscosity risk and, crucial for you, suggest exact formulation plans to lessen that risk. This is a data-driven way to get you a clear, efficient path to a stable, low-viscosity, commercial-ready formulation. We act as your strategic partner, giving you not just data, but also clear reasons and a solid development plan.

5. Value Provided to Customers

If you're a leader in CMC and Drug Product Development, this approach offers clear benefits that directly help with your main strategic goals:

  • De-risking and Early Candidate Selection: Our predictive tools let you check viscosity risk when you're picking candidates. This means you can pick molecules that are easier to develop and avoid pouring money into one that will hit big formulation problems.

  • Accelerated Timelines: By ditching broad, blind experiments for a focused, data-driven approach, we cut down the time it takes to develop formulations.[12, 13] This helps you get to a stable formulation faster and speed up your IND and BLA submissions.

  • Material Sparing: Using computer simulations and focused experiments means you use less of your valuable drug substance for formulation work, saving it for other crucial studies.

  • A Robust Data Package: A formulation strategy guided by predictive models and backed by targeted experiments builds a strong, solid CMC story for investors and regulators. It shows you have a proactive, science-driven way of developing products.

By blending AI predictions with our formulation know-how, we help you create a better product, quicker. We provide the structure, speed, and real solutions you need to confidently handle the trickiness of high-concentration mAb development.

FAQ

1. How accurate are AI viscosity predictions?
AI models are much more accurate now. Lots of models can now tell if antibodies will have high or low viscosity, with reported accuracies between 85% and 90%. Think of these tools not as a magic ball, but as a super effective way to reduce risk and guide experiments much more efficiently than old methods.[25, 27]

2. What information is needed to start a viscosity prediction?
Most models mainly need the amino acid sequence of the antibody's variable region (Fv). From that sequence, computer tools can build 3D models and figure out things like surface charge and hydrophobicity, which are then fed into the prediction algorithm.[21, 26]

3. Does this technology replace the need for experimental lab work?[21, 26]
No. Predictive models are a guide, not a substitute for actual lab data. They let you design experiments that are much more focused and smarter. Instead of checking dozens of conditions, the models help pinpoint a smaller, promising set of formulations to confirm in the lab. The idea is to "pilot first, scale second," using the model to get things right quicker.

4. How does this fit into our existing drug development workflow?
You can bring in AI-driven viscosity assessment very early, ideally when you're picking your lead candidate. The predictions give you extra data to help make smart decisions, along with efficacy and safety data.[12, 13] For a chosen candidate, these predictions then guide the initial formulation design, making the move into process development smoother and more predictable.

5. Can these tools predict the effect of specific excipients?
Some advanced models are starting to include the effects of different formulation conditions and excipients. For now, the main strength is predicting how prone the mAb itself is to becoming viscous.[7] This prediction then helps our expert formulators choose the best excipients, like arginine, to test for reducing viscosity.[28, 29, 3]

Literature

  1. drugdeliveryleader.com

  2. drugdeliveryleader.com

  3. sigmaaldrich.com

  4. pharmaceutical-technology.com

  5. nih.gov

  6. pharmasalmanac.com

  7. mit.edu

  8. humanjournals.com

  9. nih.gov

  10. pistoiaalliance.org

  11. biointron.com

  12. nih.gov

  13. researchgate.net

  14. researchgate.net

  15. nih.gov

  16. tandfonline.com

  17. researchgate.net

  18. pharmaexcipients.com

  19. researchgate.net

  20. biorxiv.org

  21. nih.gov

  22. nih.gov

  23. tandfonline.com

  24. nih.gov

  25. nih.gov

  26. stevens.edu

  27. nih.gov

  28. nih.gov

  29. nih.gov

Further Articles

Further Articles

Further Articles