ai-powered-screening-of-pharmaceutical-formulation-excipients

Beyond Trial and Error: AI-Powered Screening of Pharmaceutical Formulation Excipients

Beyond Trial and Error: AI-Powered Screening of Pharmaceutical Formulation Excipients

Beyond Trial and Error: AI-Powered Screening of Pharmaceutical Formulation Excipients

20.08.2025

5

Minutes

Leukocare Editorial Team

20.08.2025

5

Minutes

Leukocare Editorial Team

Formulating complex biologics is a high-stakes challenge, with traditional trial-and-error methods proving slow and inefficient for excipient selection. This limits optimal stability and wastes precious drug substance. Discover how AI-powered screening of pharmaceutical excipients offers a predictive, data-driven solution for faster, more effective development.

Menu

Beyond Trial and Error: AI-Powered Screening of Pharmaceutical Formulation Excipients

1. Current Situation

2. Typical Market Trends

3. Current Challenges and How They Are Solved

4. How Leukocare Can Support These Challenges

5. Value Provided to Customers

6. FAQ

Beyond Trial and Error: AI-Powered Screening of Pharmaceutical Formulation Excipients

Formulating a biologic is a high-stakes balancing act. On one side, you have a complex, sensitive molecule with therapeutic potential. On the other, you have immense pressure to move quickly toward the clinic while conserving precious drug substance. The choices made here in development have long-lasting consequences for stability, manufacturability, and regulatory success.

For years, formulation science has relied on a mix of experience, established practices, and iterative lab work. But as molecules become more complex and timelines shrink, this usual approach is showing its limits. We need a more predictive, data-driven way to navigate the formulation design space.

1. Current Situation

The biologic pipeline is filled with increasingly complex molecules, from monoclonal antibodies to cell and gene therapies.[2, 4] These large molecules are naturally fragile and sensitive to their environment.[3, 4] Finding the right combination of inactive ingredients, or excipients, to keep them stable and effective is a big development challenge.[5, 6]

The usual approach often involves selecting a handful of common excipients based on experience and testing them through trial and error. This process is slow, uses a lot of early-stage material, and explores only a small fraction of the possible formulation space.[24, 7, 8] As a result, teams can spend months on formulation, sometimes settling for a "good enough" solution that may create challenges later in development.

2. Typical Market Trends

Several trends are making traditional formulation methods harder:

  • The Rise of Complex Modalities: The industry is moving toward therapies like viral vectors, mRNA, and cell therapies, which have unique stability needs.[10, 9] The cell and gene therapy market, valued at over $21 billion in 2024, is expected to grow by 18.7% each year through 2034, showing how much people want these advanced treatments.[11, 12]

  • Increased Outsourcing: More companies, especially small and virtual biotechs, are outsourcing Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) activities to specialized partners.[13, 14] This is because companies need special skills and facilities without having to pay a lot for them.[15]

  • Focus on Data and Speed: There is a clear demand for faster, more efficient drug development.[15] The Quality by Design (QbD) framework, encouraged by regulators, requires a deep, data-supported understanding of how materials and processes affect final product quality.[16, 17, 18] A weak formulation can put timelines and funding at risk.

3. Current Challenges and How They Are Solved

CMC and Drug Product teams face a common set of difficult challenges in formulation:

  • So Many Choices: There are hundreds of approved excipients, including various buffers, sugars, surfactants, and amino acids.[19] Systematically testing even a small number of them in the lab isn't practical. Formulators typically rely on a short list of familiar excipients, which works for standard molecules but can miss better options for novel or sensitive ones.

  • Not Enough Material: In early development, every milligram of drug substance is valuable.[20] The high failure rate of drug candidates means that resources spent on one project are carefully scrutinized.[21, 22] Lab-intensive screening methods can quickly deplete the supply of a candidate molecule, limiting how many conditions can be tested and forcing teams to make compromises.

  • Tight Timelines: The pressure to reach IND and Phase I is constant. Formulation development is often a critical step. To save time, teams might select a simple, interim formulation to get into the clinic quickly. This can create risks later, sometimes requiring an expensive and long reformulation for late-stage trials or commercial launch.[23]

4. How Leukocare Can Support These Challenges

Instead of relying solely on physical screening, we use a data-driven approach to map the formulation landscape before setting foot in the lab. Our platform uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning models to predict how a specific molecule will behave with a wide range of excipients.[24, 7, 8]

Here is how it works:

  1. Data Analysis: We start by analyzing the specific characteristics of your molecule.

  2. In Silico Screening: Our AI platform screens hundreds of excipients computationally, using a huge internal database built from years of lab work. It identifies which ones are most likely to stabilize your molecule and points out those that could cause issues like clumping or breaking down.[25, 26]

  3. Focused Experimental Design: The AI doesn't give a final answer; it provides a smart starting point. It generates a ranked short list of the most promising excipient candidates. This allows us to design a much more focused and effective Design of Experiments (DoE) in the lab. We move forward with experiments that are guided by data, not guesswork.

This mix of predicting and focused lab work lets us explore more options using less time and material.

5. Value Provided to Customers

This data-first approach to formulation gives direct, practical benefits that help drug development leaders with their main challenges.

  • Makes Development Less Risky: By identifying best stabilizers early, we help you build a strong, stable formulation that is built for the entire product lifecycle. This creates a good CMC story for investors and regulators.

  • Speeds Up Timelines: The computational screening and focused lab work make the formulation development timeline much shorter. This helps you get to the clinic faster with a well-understood product.

  • Saves Drug Substance: By minimizing the number of physical experiments, we save your valuable early-stage material, allowing it to be used for other important studies.

  • Offers a Strategic Partnership: We work as an extension of your team, providing not just data points but a clear, proactive strategy. We offer the deep scientific and regulatory understanding to help you make good decisions for your program.

Our goal is to help you move forward confidently, with a formulation designed by science and guided by data.

6. FAQ

Q1: Is the AI model a "black box"?
No. Our predictions are based on proven physical and chemical principles and statistical models trained on a lot of experimental data.[27] We provide a clear reason for why certain excipients are recommended, so your team understands the scientific basis for the formulation design.

Q2: How reliable are the predictions?
The AI modeling provides a very accurate short list of candidates for experimental work.[28] The goal is to make the lab work more efficient and effective, not to eliminate it. The real strength of our approach is the power of combining predictive screening with the focused DoE that follows.

Q3: Can you use this approach for new modalities like viral vectors or mRNA?
Yes. Our platform and databases are designed to handle the specific stability challenges of complex biologics, like cell and gene therapies, ADCs, and RNA-based therapeutics.[2, 4]

Q4: How does this process work with our internal team?
We adapt to your needs. For companies without a dedicated drug product team, we can handle the whole formulation development process. For organizations with internal experts, we act as a specialized partner, helping with specific challenges, such as a new type of therapy, or giving extra capacity for overflow projects without competing with or overriding your existing team.

Literature

  1. geneonline.com

  2. ascendiacdmo.com

  3. bioprocessonline.com

  4. pharmtech.com

  5. ijcrt.org

  6. europeanpharmaceuticalreview.com

  7. sciensage.info

  8. sciensage.info

  9. futuremarketinsights.com

  10. towardshealthcare.com

  11. biospace.com

  12. precedenceresearch.com

  13. asphalion.com

  14. contractpharma.com

  15. grandviewresearch.com

  16. zimlab.in

  17. americanpharmaceuticalreview.com

  18. ijpab.com

  19. nanotempertech.com

  20. umontreal.ca

  21. lindushealth.com

  22. nih.gov

  23. idbs.com

  24. ijpsjournal.com

  25. nih.gov

  26. cam.ac.uk

  27. elifesciences.org

  28. nih.gov

Further Articles

Further Articles

Further Articles